Tonight's Final review will include one final report from the City's Chief Financial Officer Corinne Bomben who will outline some background towards the recent changes that brought the proposed rate down from 15 percent to 12.5%, as well as to summarize some of the feedback received by city staff related to the Budget process.
The Budget update also notes of some changes towards upcoming infrastructure work.
Of note from those items:
An increase in the cost for the Shawatlans Road water line, originally proposed at 10 million dollars now increased to 20 million dollars, still to be funded by provincial grant.
Work on the 1st Avenue East Water Main has been revised to 1.4 million down from the initial estimate of 2.1 million; that shift comes with funding for a new project of a sewer main relocation which will cost 700 thousand dollars.
The City has also added to the Wastewater Capital planning adding in -tandem Sewer pipe replacement at a cost of 20 Million funded through borrowing.
click to enlarge |
As for the report on the participation level when it comes to the simulation program; the document notes of a decline in participation with 21 residents sharing their financial budget making skills, down from 28 one year ago.
Two thirds of those who participated in the program indicated that they were fine with the leaving the tax rate request as it is, with one-third preferring to see a decrease to the tax call.
How they would allocate the funding is available for review below:
click to enlarge |
click to enlarge |
While the deficit gets all the headlines. Our civic debt has doubled in the past five years.
ReplyDelete2018 - Prince Rupert tax payers serviced $1,165,000 in total municipal debt and interest.
2022 - $2,446,000 is the amount debt and interest that Prince Rupert tax payers had to service.
Source - our annual five year financial plans
https://www.princerupert.ca/city_hall/city_financials
It’s called a new landfill and a new RCMP station. New big things that are legally required cost money.
DeleteAlso as an aside, would certainly be nice for our community to have better annul cash flow from Port industry in order to increase our debt borrowing capacity and servicing abilities
That debt does not include the recent rcmp loan. Landfill was gas tax grant funded.
DeleteIt would certainly be nice for our community to not carry $20 million in Citywest debt. Which is a separate line item in our financials under a loan. Which they get a holiday on from paying.
BTW Citywest had $20 million forgiven in 2008 because it was too hard to pay back.
It would be nice if the city would start bringing stuff in on time and on budget. The city is not remotely close. Time for council to quit with that attaboy and ask tough questions!
DeleteThe “Landfill Loan FAQ” on the City’s website begs to differ with you
ReplyDeleteSure an annual gas tax went to The Landfill Lagoon Project and then the city took out a loan with the MFA for the rest of it.
Delete$500k annually to service a 10 million loan through tipping fees states the faq.
Citywest owes 20+ million and only pays $500k?
Don’t forget 2008, Citywest had 20 million forgiven.