Skeena-Bulkley Valley Gun Petition makes for House of Commons tempest in opening week
Conservative MP Damien Kurek from Alberta introduced a petition from Skeena-Bulkley Valley, a presentation that set of some Parliamentary fireworks earlier this week
The introduction of a petition signed by residents of Skeena-Bulkley Valley has made for some fascinating political theatre in the House of Commons, with calls for apologies and some making for some positioning for the upcoming election campaign all part of the narrative.
The drama-a-rama of the Commons began with the introduction of the Skeena-Bulley Valley petition by a Member of Parliament from Alberta, with Battle River-Crowfoot MP Damien Kurek stating that the petition had been refused to be presented by the NDP MP for the riding Taylor Bachrach.
"Mr. Speaker, as always, it is an honour to stand in this place and present petitions. I am presenting a unique petition today, because this particular petition was offered to the member for Skeena—Bulkley Valley, but he refused to present it in this place.
Therefore, I stand on behalf of the people of Skeena—Bulkley Valley and present this petition that calls for a number of things, highlights the absurdity of Liberal gun rules and calls upon the Government of Canada to stop any and all current and future bans on hunting and sport shooting firearms.
It is an honour to stand in this place on behalf of the people of Skeena—Bulkley Valley and represent them, because their MP certainly is not. "-- Battle River-Crowfoot ConservativeMP Damien Kurek
To get a better understanding of the Tuesday tempest in the House of Commons, The North Coast Review reached out to the Member of Parliament's Ottawa office, seeking some clarification on the situation.
The reply from Legislative Assistant Margaret Crew noted that the MP "never received a request to sponsor the petition, but he did have an odd in-person interaction with a Conservative Party activist in Smithers who asked him to sign the petition (which, as a parliamentarian, he doesn’t do)."
A further observation charts some of the political temperature both in Ottawa and in the Skeena-Bulkley Valley riding as the election speculation period heats up this year.
"It’s simply political game playing on the part of the Conservatives. Taylor is focused on priorities like securing federal funds for Prince Rupert’s water infrastructure, delivering dental care and building affordable housing."
The correspondence also observed on some of Mr. Bachrach's past work on the issue of firearms.
Noting that the MP "is proud of his work pushing back against the Liberal government’s ill-advised amendments that would have affected people in the northwest who use hunting rifles and shotguns."
To highlight that theme, a presentation in the House of December 8th by the MP in the House of Commons was included in the reply.
Mr. Bachrach's spokesperson also noted that from the day's proceedings that the MP's were made to apologize by the Speaker, though from the day's proceedings you have to parse a lot of words to find any Conservative versions of mea culpa.
So far, the Skeena-Bulkley Valley MP has yet to respond to the theatre of earlier this week in the House through his Social media platforms of Facebook or Twitter X.
The Conservative focus on the Northwest riding from this early start however should serve as a preview of more to come as the Parliamentary session moves forward.
As we saw and heard last month in Prince Rupert, the Conservatives clearly believe that with Ellis Ross as their nominee, the prospect of toppling the NDP in Skeena-Bulkley Valley is something that they believe is doable.
And from that, we imagine that this riding will see much more attention, a lot more rhetoric and much more political theatre in the House and away from it as a pre election narrative.
Calling a constituent an “activist” doesn’t sound like very inclusive language. The political game is always a two way street. The apology exchange between members and the speaker will be in the house highlights of 2024.
I don't think that referring to someone a "Conservative party activist" is exclusionary language, although some might regard it as an insult or not very nice.
There are constituents and then there are constituents who are activists. “ Dictionary Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more noun a person who campaigns to bring about political or social change. "activists have been calling for change"
What do we know about that interaction? Perhaps the person introduced themselves as a Conservative Party activist. If there weren't any Conservative activists this commentary thread would be dead.
I have yet to actually receive a callback or conversation with Taylor in regards to the many things I have brought forward to his office. I have spoken with his team but he has never responded to me as a voter in his riding. That speaks volumes to me. Perhaps his riding isn’t his riding for long.
Sorry to see that you had trouble getting a response. I have had many constructive interactions with Taylor and have no problem with him representing me.
Calling a constituent an “activist” doesn’t sound like very inclusive language.
ReplyDeleteThe political game is always a two way street.
The apology exchange between members and the speaker will be in the house highlights of 2024.
I don't think that referring to someone a "Conservative party activist" is exclusionary language, although some might regard it as an insult or not very nice.
ReplyDeleteThere are constituents and then there are constituents who are activists. “ Dictionary
ReplyDeleteDefinitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
noun
a person who campaigns to bring about political or social change.
"activists have been calling for change"
Advocate would have been more NDP like word choice. But that is reserved for environmentalists.
ReplyDelete"but he did have an odd in-person interaction with a Conservative Party activist in Smithers who asked him to sign the petition"
"but he did have an odd in-person interaction with a Firearms advocate in Smithers who asked him to sign the petition"
What do we know about that interaction? Perhaps the person introduced themselves as a Conservative Party activist. If there weren't any Conservative activists this commentary thread would be dead.
ReplyDeleteIt was the response from the MP's Legislative Assistant that has generated the commentary.
DeleteI have yet to actually receive a callback or conversation with Taylor in regards to the many things I have brought forward to his office. I have spoken with his team but he has never responded to me as a voter in his riding. That speaks volumes to me. Perhaps his riding isn’t his riding for long.
ReplyDeleteSorry to see that you had trouble getting a response. I have had many constructive interactions with Taylor and have no problem with him representing me.
ReplyDelete