With the Northwest BC group providing the John Horgan cabinet with a blueprint of sorts as to what the NWRBA is looking for from the province.
The document was submitted to the British Columbia government's Rural Development Strategy public engagement process on Wednesday, and with its delivery to the province, Northwest British Columbia Regional Benefits Alliance Chair Bill Miller made note of the group's support for the development of a rural strategy.
But also added a note of caution that it must address the concerns of the rural regions of the province.
“The RBA fully supports development of a Rural Development Strategy for BC that will bridge the urban-rural divide and create sustainable communities across all of rural BC,” ...“However, it’s vital to develop a strategy that takes the needs and circumstances of different rural regions into account.”
Included in their report for the province is a six point checklist that NWRBA would like to see addressed by the province. The six items of note for Mr. Horgan and his cabinet colleagues includes:
Develop a framework for rural development that is flexible enough to meet the needs of different regions.
Ensure the work done to create the Rural Development Strategy includes adequate research on existing conditions in different regions of the province.
Make sure the strategies developed take into account the level of current and potential economic activity within different regions, with a focus on translating that activity into sustainable communities.
Recognize that the benefits of economic development in rural areas must improve the long-term sustainability of rural communities.
Commit to working closely with groups, such as the RBA, in each region to formulate a governance model for a particular region.
Use the proposal put forward by the RBA as a pilot project to develop and test strategies to support sustainable economic development and sustainable communities in rural BC.
Of note for residents of Prince Rupert is a segment of the report that focuses on the preparations that the city embarked on in the early days of potential LNG development.
With Prince Rupert City Manager Robert Long noting how the city had to "invest scarce city resources to determine the potential impact on services and infrastructure that could result"
 |
| The City of Prince Rupert's submission to the Northwest Resource Benefits Alliance submission to the Provincial government on issues related to rural development (click to enlarge) |
Not noted in the presentation however, is the way that the City of Prince Rupert approached that process of three years ago, a period of time where much of the discussion on the planning for major projects and associated other industrial development was done outside of the public council session.
Had the city council addressed some of that burden of planning through the public forum of a council session, perhaps residents might have then been provided more details related to the volume of public money that the city was planning to allocate towards that project.
As well, had the public forum of a Council session been used, it would have allowed for public discussion by the Council members as to whether they were all in agreement that those volumes of scarce city resources should have been spent.
Since the discussions related to that planning were held largely out of public view, we'll never really know whether a more scaled back roll out of all those elements might have been discussed by Council members.
Or if some thought had been given towards having the City wait a bit until the ever changing development picture in the region had become a little more clear and stable.
Other community snapshots that are included in the report for the province come from Terrace, Telkwa, Hazelton and Fort St. James
As for what the Northwest collective is looking for when it comes to sustainable economic growth, the submission explores themes related to the desire for good jobs, training and apprenticeships for residents, as well as First Nations participation, respect for the natural environment and an economic return that creates sustainable and vibrant communities.
 |
| The areas where the NWRBA hope to see some cooperation with the Provincial government on goals of sustainable growth and Sustainable communities (click to enlarge) |
As we made note of at Budget time in February, there had been a fairly lengthy period of silence from the Northwest Alliance since they hailed the arrival of the new NDP government.
The declarations from the NWRBA at the time were to the effect that the newly arrived government was somewhat of a breath of fresh air when it came to their aspirations of a larger share for local government when it comes to resource development.
The main takeaway from September was the sense of optimism which RBA Co-Chair and Kitimat Mayor Phil Germuth had expressed for the process ahead:
“The John Horgan government really understands that we experience great inequity in the northwest,”
“The Northwest is the backbone of BC, and in order to ensure our communities continue to support economic development activities that contribute to the province, we need a share of the revenues to stay in the Northwest.
The Premier sees that investing in the Northwest is not just about making up for lost time, but spurring growth in the region. It is an investment from which the entire province can expect a large economic return " -- RBA Co-Chair Phil Germuth in September 2017 following meetings with Premier John Horgan
With the release of their report yesterday, RBA Co-Chair Barry Pages, who is also the Chair of the North Coast Regional District, seems to have scaled back some of that early euphoria, with what seems like more of a we'll see where this leads approach.
In his statement from Wednesday's release, Mr. Pages notes that the group continues to applaud the province's work on rural issues, but adds that the current funding is at an unreasonable level to effect much in the way of change.
“We applaud the province for its prompt attention to rural development, as it has been neglected for so many years,” .. “However, the existing $25 million available through the Rural Dividend program is totally inadequate to deal with the problems faced by rural communities, and we look forward to continuing to work with the province to develop a new strategy that works for each region in rural BC.”
The information release from the NWRBA also notes that to date, no benefits sharing agreement has been reached between the organization and the provincial government, with the two sides still continuing to meet towards some form of solutions for the Northwest.
You can review the full document from the Resource Benefits Alliance here.
Some of our past notes on their work can be examined below:
October 2017 -- Ellis Ross returns to themes on RBA initiative during Committee session
September 2017 -- Northwest politicians hail progress on Resource Benefit Alliance negotiations
September 2017 -- NDP government appears to cool towards Northwest Resource Benefits calls for increased revenues
August 2017 -- Northwest Resource Benefits Alliance members hail new government's engagement on revenue issues
August 2017 -- Northwest Resource Benefits video highlights Alliance talking points from Victoria trip
May 2017 -- Resource Benefits Alliance hails NDP leader's support for better arrangement
August 2015 -- Northwest BC Resource Benefits Alliance to hold Summit on Revenue sharing
August 2015 -- Northwest leaders meet on Resource Benefits Alliance
January 2015 -- City of Prince Rupert signs Memorandum of Understanding with Northwest BC Resources Benefits Alliance
October 2014 -- Northwest Benefit Alliance outlines its mission for City Council
October 2014 -- Northwest BC Resource Benefits Alliance to make presentation to Council tonight
September 2014 -- Council giving thought to joining Northwest Alliance initiative
For more items related to Municipal/Provincial issues see our Legislature archive.
Items of interest on issues for the City of Prince Rupert can be reviewed through our Council Discussion page.
To return to the most recent blog posting of the day, click here.
Back in 2015 the Planning for Major Projects initiative, spending $1.3 million a year for four years for a full-time mayor, staff increases, and other expenses to "attract resources", was presented as being at no cost to taxpayers since the money would be coming from Legacy. The issue was not framed as "spending scarce city resources". It's not clear what value for money the City got out of the initiative. Perhaps the government has questions about whether the City really needed to spend so much.
ReplyDeleteThe city can never do anything right according to btravven and north coast review! even though a deal means lower taxes for us
ReplyDeleteSince when has RBA been about lowering taxes? It's supposed to be about improving services and infrastructure for smaller municipalities.
DeleteRBA has various problems: 1) the Province already puts more money per capita into small municipalities than into larger centres, 2) additional revenue from LNG now seems unlikely, and 3) over the last three years the City hasn't presented itself as running on a shoestring.
Well that's not quite correct, when initiatives have been proposed, or results have been delivered, we have reported those events as presented. For instance refer to today's item on Councillor Cunningham's proposal for derelict fine collection, or the recent letter writing resolution from Council on the fishery.
ReplyDeleteAs for the RBA Benefits deal you refer to ... when will the document be signed and what benefits will we receive?
All of that isn't quite so clear at the moment.
NCR